« Who Else Is Bored? | Main | Weekly Whitepaper Room Refresh »

REPLY TO ALL: Am I Being Overly Paranoid About Spam Filters When Writing My Subject Lines?

Both SubscriberMail and Blue Sky Factory recently released lists of words that shouldn’t be used in emails because they’re likely to trigger spam filters. But I see some of these words—like “free” and “discount”—used routinely in the subject lines of commercial email that I receive. If I have a good reputation do I need to worry about content filters? Am I staying away from these words unnecessarily? —S.G.

The Voices of Email had this advice:

J.F. Sullivan: The answer should be no. If you have a good reputation then you do not need to worry about content filters. The actual answer is another question, as in it depends on two things: What’s your definition of a good reputation, and which content filter are we talking about?

Everyone in the email marketing (and message security) ecosystem has a different view of what a good reputation actually means. For some it’s as simple as making sure they are not on a blocklist; for others it may be that they are in compliance with a specific Sender Authentication implementation. In order to answer “yes” to the question, it may be more useful to provide a checklist summary of what a good reputation constitutes. So, if you can say “yes” to the following reputation aspects:

1. You have a good public reputation (not on blocklists, or have upset any ISPs).
2. You have good legislative adherence (e.g., CAN-SPAM compliance).
3. You have good infrastructure (e.g., DNS, MX records and the like).
4. You have good identity (e.g., you have a correctly configured SenderID record).
5. You have best practices (e.g., list scrubbing, opt-in, etc.).
…then yes, you do have a good reputation so you will not need to worry too much about content filters. And while your good reputation will work, say, 80% of the time, your actual delivery will still depend on the content filter you encounter to some degree. A subject of much longer blog entry for another day…

Rob Fitzgerald: You always need to be aware that filtering exists, but I don’t think you need to be ruled by that existence either. It’s interesting to lay out all the various releases, of all the various words that shouldn’t be used within in an email, and see how incredibly long that list is. Sometimes it makes me wonder how you can actually put a string of sentences together without actually using any of them. Practically speaking, you have to use some words that may be “known” filter words. I don’t think that should give you pause to run the campaign for fear of a lack of response. We’ve sent out many campaigns with the word “Free” on them that have performed very well.

I tend to look at it this way—it’s all about moderation. Put together a creative with a lot of words that trigger filtering and it could be adversely affected. Give that same creative a diet, and keep some of those same words included, but not all of them, and I think you’ll be OK.

Stephanie Miller: Despite the frequency that I receive this question, there is still no magical list of words to avoid, nor is the use of marketing terms like “free,” “discount,” “special offer” and “click here” an automatic block. Don’t misunderstand. Those words can get you blocked. However, judicious, responsible and clear use of them usually won’t.

Why? Because spam filters dynamically update to reflect current market conditions and spammer behavior. The only way to ensure your content does not depress inbox deliverability is to run every email through a series of popular message filters to determine your spam score before sending to your entire mailing list. You can do this through a service or on your own by setting up multiple accounts at different ISPs.

Here’s how to optimize your message for response and deliverability: Write the copy as a marketer. Sell. Build the relationship. Clarify the offer. Make the call to action very clear. Then, test it. If you fail the spam filters, adjust it. Before you hit send, even if you pass the filter test, be sure to give your message AND subject line a “smell test.” If your readers or subscribers will think it’s spammy, so will the receivers. If you are using all capped, repetitive words that filters watch like “FREE SHIPPING THAT’S FREE” or using strange punctuation like ***NOW ON SALE***, then you are likely to be blocked.

Chad White: Inspired by this question, I did a little real world research and found that major online retailers have used many of the “dirty” words on SubscriberMail’s list of words to avoid using in subject lines. How many have they used? They’ve used 27 of the 100 in the past two months alone. Some of the words—like “Free,” “FREE,” “Offer” and “Buy”—they used a LOT. So it’s clearly possible to use these no-no words in subject lines under the right conditions. Based on that I’d say that you should explore using them but test to make sure your emails are getting through.

Have some good advice that we missed? Please add a comment and take part in the conversation.

Have a question for the Voices of Email? Email Chad your question at chad@emailexperience.org and we’ll REPLY TO ALL by posting the answers so everyone can benefit.

-->Read other Reply to All posts

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.emailexperience.org/bins/mt/mt-tb.cgi/79

Comments (3)

Emily:

Hi there. This is a useful post, but it doesn't answer my biggest question. If reputable organizations have to be careful about word choice so their emails won't be blocked, why do we get SO MUCH spam? Why would I ever receive an email about viagra from anyone, much less from a bogus sender? I have been reading about email marketing a lot lately have not found the answer to this question. Am I just missing something obvious?

Posted by Emily | August 28, 2007 2:00 PM

Posted on August 28, 2007 14:00

Emily,

The amount of spam email you personally receive also has many variables - what ISP or Web mail provider you use; what email client you use; if you use an after market spam filter; is your email address posted on Web sites and being harvested by spammers, etc.

I use Gmail for personal email and get almost no spam emails in my inbox - maybe 1-2 per week; while getting hundreds in the Gmail spam folder. Work is a different story - I get 300-400 or more spam emails a day - about 50-100 of them in my inbox, the rest in my junk folders. The difference between my Gmail account and work account is two fold - the difference in how Gmail filters versus our work email provider and the fact that my work email address is posted in many locations and harvested like crazy.

Having a good sender reputation will greatly increase deliverability for legit marketers - but poor flitering by your ISP or email provider allows the bad stuff in to your inbox.

Posted by Loren McDonald | August 29, 2007 2:50 AM

Posted on August 29, 2007 02:50

Unfortunately, the answer is as varied as the security solutions in the market place multiplied by the ways to get the email delivered. Certainly, if you are still getting email with the subject line of "FREE SEX" then your spam filter is awful and needs to be replaced.

That said, you are obviously pointing to a larger problem around authenticated senders and how illegitimate email is still getting into your inbox, if reputable senders are following the rules. A pithy answer is that the methods used by spammers to penetrate security solutions are always evolving; usually faster than their associated security solutions. That, and the fact that neither SenderID or DKIM is authenticating a majority of the email being sent....or that Goodmail has not managed to install its solution at >80% of the sending MTA in the world! :-)

Consider the following evolutionary path:

Subject: SEX, VIAGRA, FREE
Solution: Search for SEX, VIAGRA, FREE

Subject: Sex, ViaGra, FrEe
Solution: Search for mixed cases of Sex, Viagra, and Free

Subject: S*e*x, V1agra, 5ree
Solution: Search for "intentional" misspellings of Sex, Viagra and Free

Etc., etc., etc.,

Subject: Your Dad said to look at this...
Attachment: dadsadvice.pdf
Inside the PDF?: SEX, VIAGRA, FREE
Solution: Detach, quarantine, etc. PDF attachments

My point is that the fact that content (be it subject, body or attachment) may still as indelicate as it was 8 years ago is simply a reflection of the fact that an unfortunate group of people will click on those emails and spammers know that. Therefore, they do everything they can to make sure that they use those words, that content, to promote in their mailings. They bypass the spam filters by supporting authentication (at least SenderID), they use additional, superfluous content to confuse the content filtering algorithms, etc., ad nauseum. The spam filters continually have to adapt to these tactics and therefore you continue to get email that has obvious spam content.

Consider the question you didn’t ask however. That is, why is it that Reputable emailers get blocked when they send email that contains certain catch phrases or words if the security solutions are constantly changing their detection to match the spammers? The answer to that is actually much simpler…the security solutions (as a sweeping generalization) rarely throw any specific tactic away because spammers have a habit of reusing old tactics in random ways to probe what the security solutions are capable of. So, SEX, VIAGRA, and FREE are searched by the security solution in the example above for…ever.

Posted by J.F. Sullivan | August 29, 2007 8:21 AM

Posted on August 29, 2007 08:21

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

the voice of email
Welcome to the Email Experience Council's blog, a forum for the email marketing industry's leading voices. On these pages, you'll find the opinions and thought-leadership that's driving the next evolution of email.

feed sign-up

Subscribe to the Email Experience Blog Subscribe via RSS or email.

newsletter sign-up

After subscribing to this blog feed, also sign up for the Email Experience Council's weekly newsletter, which contains information on the latest email marketing initiatives, research, news and events.

Become a Sponsor of the Email Experience Council

search this blog

recent posts

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

the voices of email

The Email Experience Council's membership includes many of the brightest and most committed email marketing experts. We're pleased to have some of them share their insights here on these pages. Our blog contributors include:

Elie Ashery is the president and CEO of Gold Lasso, and is responsible for the company’s vision and strategy execution. Before joining Gold Lasso, he co-founded Newsletters.com in 1997, selling it to The Tribune Cos. in 2000. He then worked for IncenSoft, focusing on email marketing while there. Read more.

Amy Bills is the senior manager of field marketing at lead optimization company Bulldog Solutions. She is responsible for lead generation and the go-to-market execution of Bulldog's new products and initiatives. Amy was previously the editorial team leader of Freescale Semiconductor’s internal creative agency and a senior editor at Hoover’s Online. Read more.

Nicholas Einstein is director of strategic and analytic services at Datran Media. Specializing in email and CRM strategy, he helps some of America’s top brands leverage online channels to communicate more effectively with their customers and prospects.

Lisa Harmon is a principal at Smith-Harmon, a creative services consultancy dedicated to email marketing strategy and production. She works with marketers to increase clickthrough, maximize revenue, and infuse delight into their email creative. Lisa is also the blogger behind edm.smith-harmon.com, an ongoing commentary on the best (and worst!) in email marketing creative. Read more.

Chip House is ExactTarget's VP of marketing services, leading the teams responsible for client success. He was named to BtoB Magazine’s 2005 “Who’s Who in B-To-B,” for being a vocal proponent of legitimate commercial email and an active lobbyist regarding spam and privacy issues. Read more.

Spencer Kollas is the director of delivery services at StrongMail, helping maximize customers’ email deliverability rates. He was previously director of deliverability services for Premiere Global Services. Spencer is an active member in the Email Sender & Provider Coalition, Messaging Anti-Abuse Work Group, the Anti-Phishing Work Group and, of course, the eec. Read more.

Stephanie Miller is VP of strategic services for Return Path, the leading email performance company. She works with marketers to earn a higher ROI and response from their acquisition and retention email programs—developing content, contact and segmentation strategies, along with testing, measurement and production programs. Read more.

Erick Mott is the director of marketing and corporate communications for Habeas, the leader in email reputation management services. He has a rich background in marketing and communications strategy and execution for such companies as Nokia, MarkMonitor, GlobalFluency, Cisco Systems, Creator Connection, Sun Microsystems, Philips NV, Elm Products and CBS Television. Read more.

Jeanniey Mullen is the Email Experiene Council's founder and the global EVP and CMO of global online publishing company Zinio. She is a thought leader and visionary in the email and digital marketing field. A columnist for ClickZ, she has published numerous papers and is a frequent speaker. Read more.

Charles Stiles is the VP of worldwide business development at Goodmail Systems. In his role, Charles is focused on helping generate a better understanding of the email environment and potential solutions for a better consumer experience. He currently serves as the chairman for the Messaging Anti-Abuse Work Group. Read more.

Jeremy Swift is director of client relations for email service provider BlueHornet. He helped form BlueHornet’s founding team in 2000 and has been responsible for client services and marketing strategy since the company’s inception. Jeremy is known for his ability to articulate technical information in ways that clearly resonate with today’s online marketer.

DJ Waldow is an account manager at Bronto Software. He works with Bronto’s largest clients to help them achieve and surpass their marketing goals. An active member of the email marketing community, DJ posts regularly on the Email Marketer’s Club, publishes a bi-weekly email marketing best practices newsletter, and films BrontoFire.

Chad White is the Email Experience Council’s director of retail insights and editor-at-large. He founded and is the author of the Retail Email Blog, a blog dedicated to tracking the email marketing practices of the largest online retailers. Chad regularly writes major research reports on email marketing and is an Email Insider columnist for MediaPost. Read more.

recommended blogs

  • RetailEmail.Blogspot
  • Epsilon Insights
  • Listrak's Email Marketing Blog
  • The Agitator
  • Datran Media's Outperformance Marketing
  • Gold Lasso's The From Line
  • eROI's The Email Wars
  • Email Marketing Strategy from Silverpop CEO Bill Nussey
  • eROI's Email Days
  • Return Path
  • Bill's Blog
  • eROI's Return on Subscriber
  • Goodmail's blog
  • Chris Baggott's Email Marketing Best Practices
  • Blue Sky Factory's The Thinking Inbox
  • MindComet's Email Marketing Voodoo
  • SubscriberMail's Best Practices
  • Tamara's Email Marketing Best Practices Blog
  • The BrightWave Blog
  • Smith-Harmon EDM Review
  • MailerMailer's The Touch
  • MediaPost Email Insider blog