Can We Talk? The eec's New Speaker Bureau

Thursday, May 15, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

From the eec's Member RoundtablesAsk me what I do for a living. Go ahead. Ask. I love to tell people about email marketing, and so do most of our eec members. So after a lot of discussion and effort, we're proud to announce the launch of the eec Speakers Bureau. The concept is a simple one, but with tremendous power behind it. While most of us in the eec live and breathe (and dream and sweat) email marketing, that's not necessarily the case with all marketers everywhere. Many companies either don't do email marketing or worse, do it badly.

The new Speakers Bureau will match eec members with speaking opportunities at events that without our support would have little or no programming about email marketing. The goal of the Bureau is to spread fundamental best practices by proactively reaching out to communities where our message of responsible, permission-based email marketing can do the most good.

But we need your help to make this a big success. We want to expand the roster of available speakers to be able to provide assistance to conference organizers large and small. Please join the Speakers Bureau and register to be considered for speaking requests in your community.

Additionally, let us know of any conferences or events that would be an ideal platform to deliver marketers information about email marketing best practices. We'll match up the organization's needs with a speaker. We would also appreciate it if you let us know about articles, whitepapers and other free resources related to the topics covered by the Bureau that can be distributed to support and extend our presentations.

Many thanks to everyone on the Communications Roundtable who worked long and hard to get us to this point. We look forward to making the Speakers Bureau beneficial for eec members and the organizations we reach out to, providing lots of information about email marketing at its basic and its best.

—eec Communications Roundtable co-chair Kay Cavender of Silverpop

Members-Only Conference Call About New CAN-SPAM Rules on May 16

Tuesday, May 13, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

Yesterday the Federal Trade Commission announced that it has approved four new rule provisions under the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003. Intended to clarify CAN-SPAM's requirements, the new provisions address four topics:

1. An e-mail recipient cannot be required to pay a fee, provide information other than his or her e-mail address and opt-out preferences, or take any steps other than sending a reply e-mail message or visiting a single Internet Web page to opt out of receiving future e-mail from a sender.

2. The definition of "sender" was modified to make it easier to determine which of multiple parties advertising in a single e-mail message is responsible for complying with the Act's opt-out requirements.

3. A "sender" of commercial e-mail can include an accurately-registered post office box or private mailbox established under United States Postal Service regulations to satisfy the Act's requirement that a commercial e-mail display a "valid physical postal address."

4. A definition of the term "person" was added to clarify that CAN-SPAM's obligations are not limited to natural persons.

The Direct Marketing Association is hosting a conference call, which is only open to Email Experience Council and DMA members, to brief members on what the new CAN-SPAM rules mean.

FTC's New CAN-SPAM Rules
Hosted by the Direct Marketing Association
Friday, May 16 at 1pm EST

–>If you are an eec or DMA member, you can register by emailing government@the-dma.org.

Romper Room and the Email Industry

Monday, April 28, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

This column is a bit different than my typical column. I won't share email strategies, bulleted suggestions, or even cool examples. Instead, I'll give some much needed and well-deserved kudos to those professionals in the email industry who keep the business alive and kicking. Hopefully it will inspire you and make you smile.

I'm going date myself with the next sentence, but don't care. Do you remember the TV show "Romper Room" from the '70s? The show was filled with a lot of educational content and socialization skills all communicated through a friendly, fun and socially supportive environment. My favorite part came at the end when the host picked up the "magic mirror" and told TV land whom she saw having a great time along with the cast. As a loyal advocate, I always waited with baited breath knowing she was going to see me and say my name (although sadly she never did).

(You can watch it here. Go to 6:13 to see the magic mirror section.)

Many of the TV shows of the '70s were like that. They offered us safe and fun social settings where we could learn along with our peers, and not be afraid to make a mistake every once and awhile. Out of that culture and era, it grew a whole big batch of 30-somethings who now have important jobs and make big decisions every day.

In the hard cold world of business, where's the "Romper Room" for grown-ups? How do we keep growing and learning along with our peers? I think the email industry very well could be the "Romper Room" of our era. As I spend more time with the communities that exist around other industries such as search, mobile, social, online, high-tech, publishing, healthcare, etc., I have yet to find a community that's as warm and inviting as the email industry.

Over the past five years, I've watched this industry grow from a technically specific product-focused world into an industry of fabulous and intelligent people. Anyone who works in the email industry should be assured of one thing: You will not only learn your craft from experts, but this community will be there to support and guide you along the way. You are fortunate to be part of this experience.

People like Dylan Boyd, David Daniels, Loren McDonald, David Baker and Tamara Gielen are priceless. They tirelessly work to evangelize the successes and strengths of email.

People like Stephanie Miller, Chad White, Justin Foster, Ali Swerdlow, Mark Brownlow, Joel Book, Lauren Skena and DJ Waldow selflessly bend over backwards to help anyone who asks them for guidance, statistics or case studies, to ensure email marketing remains respected and credible.

People like David Atlas, Kay Cavender, Deirdre Baird, Lana McGilvray, Kath Pay, Des Cahill, Skip Fidura, Richard Gibson and Lisa Harmon push us to strive to reach the next level of excellence in everything we do with email.

And I would be remiss to leave out people like Matt Blumberg, Al DiGuido, Bill Nussey, Bill McCloskey and Rob Fitzgerald, who aren't satisfied with email being considered a siloed channel and have dedicated years and years to ensuring the level of respect and reach for the industry is broadened into the realm of "digital."

My list could go on for days. (Apologies to anyone not listed). If you haven't yet run into at least one of these industry icons (and Email Experience Council members), seek them out and introduce yourself to them—through Facebook or LinkedIn, at a conference, or on the streets of New York, Massachusetts or California. A quick chat, email or even cup of coffee with any of these people will broaden your outlook on email, challenge your thoughts (for the better) and leave you feeling excited, invigorated and proud to be a part of this very tightly woven and supportive community.

—Jeanniey Mullen of the eec

Despite Performance Facts, Email Still Undervalued

Thursday, February 28, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

I spent the second week of February in Palm Desert at the eTail conference and participated in a panel discussion focused on advanced segmentation strategies. Unlike in previous years, the team at eTail set up channel-specific tracks that preceded the usual conference—email and search each had their own rooms, and sizeable crowds looking to learn more from experts in the space.

The search room was especially well attended, with nearly double the number of conference goers as the email room. Now I have done some SEM work in my day, and have the utmost respect for search professionals and the business value they provide. But, as the recent Datran 2008 Marketing & Media Survey illustrates, email often delivers stronger ROI than search. In fact, 55.3% of the survey respondents expected email to outperform all other channels on the basis of return on investment in 2008. Additionally, when asked "which advertising media buys perform strongly for your company," 80% identified email as a strong performer, compared to 70% for paid search. For this reason, 82.4% of respondents said they will increase their use of email marketing in 2008.

Again, don't get me wrong here—I am a big search advocate (especially when it's well integrated with email and other channels), but why were so many more people at eTail interested in search than email?

The reason, I believe, is that most organizations are still missing the boat on resource allocation and shortchanging email. Though email is often more effective at delivering near-term ROI, search still gets a bigger share of budget. Many of the advanced segmentation strategies we discussed at eTail require relatively significant investments of time and resources, and while they deliver excellent returns, it seems as if many of the people I spoke with were facing major resource constraints that prevented them from taking their programs to the next level.

It is our responsibility as email professionals (and evangelists) to ensure that our organizations realize the tremendous value a sophisticated email program can deliver. We need to craft email marketing performance dashboards that are designed for executive consumption—they must be clear, succinct and engaging. We need to keep our managers up to date on developments in the space and the opportunities they present to our businesses. Share the results of the Datran 2008 survey with your senior management. Leverage stats from EmailStatCenter.com in your quest for more budget. And do not take "no" for an answer.

All that is easily said. But I am still feeling a little like Rodney Dangerfield. Will the facts alone earn email the respect (and budget) it so richly deserves? What do you think? What can we in the email world do to get the resources required to drive more sophisticated and profitable programs? I'd love to hear your thoughts.

—Nicholas Einstein of Datran Media

Miss the Email Evolution Conference? Catch Up Here

Saturday, February 16, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

If you missed out on the Email Evolution Conference this year you're not completely out of luck because bloggers and reporters were all over it. In fact, during the Wednesday morning panel about email marketing bloggers, there were dozens of people that said they were blogging from the event—and a half-dozen that said they were blogging live during the session! Here's a list of posts and articles about the show to give you a little taste of what you missed (let us know if you know of others):

Email Experience Blog:
–>Voices from the Email Evolution Conference
–>Inbox Stew: Grandma, Goods, Compadres and Confirmation

RetailEmail.Blogspot:
–>Takeaways from the Email Evolution Conference

BeRelevant!:
–>Update from the Email Evolution Conference
–>Live Blogging from the Email Evolution Conference: Part 1 (LIVE BLOG)
–>EEC Conference: US Legislation and Beyond
–>Live Blogging from the Email Evolution Conference - Part 2 (LIVE BLOG)
–>Live Blogging from the Email Evolution Conference - Day 2 (LIVE BLOG)

The Email Wars:
–>Live EEC Keynote: Bloggers Unite: Passion, Power or People? (LIVE BLOG)
–>Knocked out by the eec

MediaPost:
–>Making Email, Web Analytics Play Nice: Testing Is Key
–>FTC: Data Security Is Top Concern
–>Bad Guys Make Emailing Harder
–>Email Undervalued, Works Best In Symphony With Other Tools
–>Daily Candy Founder Shares Special Sauce

BtoB Magazine:
–>Multichannel marketing highlighted at Email Evolution Conference

House of Email Marketing:
–>Reflecting on the EEC Conference: Relevance drives Deliverability and ROI

Email Insider Blog:
–>The DMA Gets It Right
–>Takeaways From The Email Evolution Conference

Return on Subscriber:
–>Dedicated IP or not a dedicated IP

Denise Cox's Blog:
–>How recipients and marketers are handling email (eec conference)
–>Some nuggets I picked up at email boot camp (eec event)

Bronto Blog:
–>Netflix Gets Email – Part 1
–>Netflix Gets Email – Part 2
–>Netflix Gets Email – Part 3

The Joeism Blog:
–>Kicking Off the Email Evolution Conference
–>Email Evolution Conference — Day 2
–>Last Day of Email Evolution Conference

Twitter streams:
–>Adam Covati

Constant Contact:
–>Insights from the Email Evolution Conference
–>From the EEC Conference: Email marketing blogs
–>From the EEC Conference: Getting inactive subscribers to engage
–>From the EEC Conference: Creating a VIP email program
–>From the EEC Conference: The DailyCandy story

Ezemail Blog
–>Email Evolution Conference Takeaways, San Diego, February 2008

Smith-Harmon EDM Review:
–>San Diego Zoo

Marketing with Technology and More:
–>Email Experience Conference Kicks Off
–>Good Quality permission and relevancy - data revealed
–>A No-Tan-Line Bikini and 70 Passionate Women

Strongmail's Email Marketing Insights:
–>LIVE from the Email Experience Conference!

Chris Baggott's Guide to Blogging:
–>Corporate Blogging Live From the Email Evolution Conference

Visitor Centric Marketing
–>Email Experience Evolution, 2/12/08

BrontoFire with DJ and Chad

Friday, February 15, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

While at the Email Evolution Conference this week, I had the pleasure of being DJ Waldow's guest on BrontoFire, Bronto Software's lively, unscripted, one-take email marketing debate show. During the webisode, DJ and I discussed the good, the bad, and the ugly of four email designs from Bluefly, All Recipes, PajamaGram, and American Airlines.

>>Watch the debate on BrontoFire

—Chad White

Inbox Stew: Grandma, Goods, Compadres and Confirmation

Wednesday, February 13, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

At this morning's kick-off to the eec's first annual Email Evolution Conference, eec founder Jeanniey Mullen showed a number of "man on the street" interviews with "real people" talking about email.

It was amusing and insightful to hear people talk about their inboxes and how they must actively manage them (you can watch one of the videos here). Better, the comments completely synched with Return Path's Fourth Annual Holiday Email Survey, where subscribers told us that they mostly just delete unread most of what they get from marketers—defined as "junk from companies I know but is just not interesting to me."

What really struck me was the video participants' storytelling. They talked about email as a sort of stew—our marketing messages are mixed up in there with notes from grandma, various lovers and a three-year-old's parents and even one gentleman's new job announcement.

Subscribers know intellectually the difference between personal, transactional and marketing messages, but it's an emotional decision to open or delete when faced with inbox clutter. Subscribers view their inbox holistically—we are not only competing against others in our industry, and transactional messages for purchases and e-statements, but we are competing with grandma's message, too.

The classic example of defining your competitive marketplace by benefit and not by product is the statement that Amtrak is in the transportation business, not the train business. So too, we email marketers are not just in the retail or travel business, we are in the business of creating compelling and interesting subscriber experiences.

We can't forget that—and frankly, it's the secret to all e-marketing success. That is why it's so hard. This is especially true as we tackle challenges around mobile and SMS messaging. What the DMA is calling "The Digital Lifestyle" still translates to subscriber experiences. The word "subscriber" is important because it's about permission. The word "experience" is important because it's about a dialogue and interactivity. It's direct marketing, so it's about driving response through targeted and well-timed messaging. And it's marketing, so it's about serving customers and demonstrating brand value.

At the center is the subscriber. Wow her, and you win. Good for Jeanniey and the eec for launching today with an engaging, inventive and visual way of showing us that the subscriber is still in charge. I'm looking forward to a great conference where I'm sure to have dozens of valuable conversations about creating compelling subscriber experiences. Look forward to hearing from you as well. Just email anytime!

—Stephanie Miller of Return Path

And the Email Performance Award finalists are…

Saturday, January 19, 2008 by eec Blog Contributor

Today the Email Experience Council announced the five finalists for its first annual Email Performance Award, which recognizes an organization that has created an email marketing campaign that demonstrates the full power of the channel. The winner of the Email Performance Award, which will be selected by the eec's members, will be presented during the Email Evolution Conference, which will be held February 12-13 at the Sheraton Hotel & Marina in San Diego.

In alphabetical order, the five finalists for the Email Performance Award are: Accor, AOL, Genentech, REI and Wacom.

For more details on each of them, including copies of their nomination forms and supporting materials, visit the eec's Email Performance Awards page. Congratulations to all the finalists.

‘Return on Trust’

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

What is the value of trust? What even is trust?

More and more we are hearing about the importance of trust in email. I have been to maybe three conferences in the past few months, and sat in on at least as many industry association and alliance meetings, where the topic of consumer trust in email comes up.

Financial segment senders tend to understand the value of ensuring customers trust email messages. Phishing attacks have a definite cost associated with them. It is relatively easy to do an economic model on the expense incurred in terms of calls to the support center, issuing corrective measures, etc. We don't have to work too hard to convince the 250 most phished brands to take measures like rolling out authentication protocols to make sure email messages can indeed be represented to consumers as genuinely from the sender the email purports to be from. The Financial Services Technology Consortium has been a real leader in this respect.

Real "trust," though, includes a number of components. At a minimum, it includes authentication, but it also includes means of conveying to a consumer not only "who really sent this email" but also "what do we know about this sender." In email "reputation" is a term of art that typically refers to things like consumer complaint rates, but in a larger context, reputation—like brand—goes to the values a consumer imputes about your company, and its email. Trust is like brand, in that sense: something that touches all aspects of your company's image, and something you can never pay too little attention to.

Marketers typically look at things like open rates, click-throughs, conversions, and other economic measures of program performance. They don't typically quantify the economic value of ensuring consumer trust. Is it possible to create a measure like "return on trust"? What is the real economic benefit to a sender of maintaining trust at the highest levels with consumers?

—Charles Stiles of Goodmail Systems

Email Performance Award nomination deadline extended to Dec. 17

Saturday, December 8, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

The Email Experience Council has extended the deadline for Email Performance Award nominations to Monday, Dec. 17.

We're looking for an email marketing campaign that demonstrates the full power of the channel, one that provides further evidence of email marketing's unsurpassed return on investment and inspiration to others seeking to elevate the performance of their own programs.

The members of the eec will select the winner from among the Email Performance Award finalists, which will be determined by the eec's leadership and announced in mid-January. The winner will receive free admission to the Email Evolution Conference at the Sheraton Hotel & Marina in San Diego, where the Email Performance Award will be officially presented on Feb. 13, 2008. So get your nominations in by Monday, Dec. 17.

–>Read the submission guidelines and download the nomination form.

Get a Free Harbor Cruise When You Register for the Email Evolution Conference

Wednesday, November 21, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

Want to cruise the San Diego harbor with more than 250 of the best minds in email marketing? Then register now for the Email Evolution Conference, which is being held Feb. 12-13 at the Sheraton Hotel & Marina in San Diego. The next 25 registrants will get a free ticket to join the conference speakers and sponsors on the cruise on the evening of Feb. 11 (a $199 value).

>>REGISTER TODAY

Attend the Email Evolution Conference Feb. 12-13 in San Diego

The eec Launches Email Performance Award

Thursday, November 15, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

Today the Email Experience Council announced its call for entries for its first award competition recognizing email marketing excellence—The Email Performance Award. The award will be presented to an individual or organization that has created an email marketing campaign that demonstrates the full power of the channel.

Entries will be evaluated for their marketing strategy, creative components, and, most importantly, results. Permission-based email marketing campaigns from any industry vertical — including B-to-B, B-to-C, nonprofit, education, etc.— are eligible for entry into the award competition as long as results described have been achieved within the last 12 months.

The Email Performance Award offers email marketers a unique opportunity to showcase the best-in-class strategies, design, and tactics that make them successful. We look forward to recognizing the brands that lead by example, and hope they provide inspiration to others seeking to further leverage the power of the email channel in their marketing mix.

Nominations close on Monday, Dec. 10, 2007. For more details about submission guidelines and entry forms, click here.

The members of the eec will select the winner from among the Email Performance Award finalists, which will be determined by the eec's leadership and announced in mid-January. The winner will receive free admission to the Email Evolution Conference at the Sheraton Hotel & Marina in San Diego, where the Email Performance Award will be officially presented on Feb. 13, 2008.

The winner of the Email Performance Award will also be placed into the semi-finals of the Direct Marketing Association's International ECHO Awards. Since 1929, the ECHO Awards, which are presented each October, have recognized the world's outstanding multichannel direct marketing campaigns based on excellence in strategy, creativity, and results.

For additional information about eec membership or the Email Performance Award, please contact Ali Swerdlow, the eec's Marketing & Sponsorship Manager, at ali@emailexperience.org or 888.804.4521, ext. 3.

More Details about the Email Evolution Conference

Saturday, November 10, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

Following the announcement we made on this blog last week regarding the availability of the session schedule for the Email Evolution Conference, yesterday we released a more formal version of that announcement to the media, adding some new details. For instance, the conference's 34 sessions will include more than 85 speakers. Over the past few days we've updated the conference program with more of those names, which include executives from National Geographic Society, Conde Nast, American Express, Gannett Co., Allstate, Live Nation, Cisco, KeyBank and eHarmony.

We also promised that each of the 27 breakout sessions will include at least one marketer, so attendees can be sure to get real-world advice on everything from deliverability and list hygiene to acquisition and multichannel marketing.

In addition to all the educational sessions, we also announced that the conference will include an Experience Hall, with exhibits from more than 40 of the industry's top vendors and service providers, including Message Systems, Puresend, Habeas, and the conference's exclusive title sponsor, ExactTarget. The Experience Hall will feature special pods instead of booths, which will allow for better networking and make you feel less like a mouse in a maze of booths.

For more information or to take advantage of early bird rates, please visit http://www.emailevolution.org.

Email Evolution Conference Schedule Released

Friday, November 2, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

We're happy to unveil the schedule for the Email Evolution Conference, which is being held in San Diego, Feb. 12-13. This initial schedule includes speaker details on our four exciting keynotes:

1. Pete Sheinbaum, the CEO of Daily Candy, will be speaking about his company's successes with email.
2. Jerry Cerasale of the DMA and Eileen Harrington of the FTC will discussing the state of privacy and marketing laws in the U.S. and abroad.
3. Dylan Boyd, one of the main people behind eROI's blogs; Tamara Gielan, the author of the BeRelevant! blog; and Chad White, the author of RetailEmail.Blogspot, will be talking about our blogging efforts, why we do what we do and where we get our ideas.
4. And JupiterResearch's David Daniels, ExactTarget's Chip House, Microsoft's Craig Spiezle and the eec's Jeanniey Mullen will be…well, it's difficult to explain. But it's sure to be unforgettable.

Outside of the keynotes, the conference is organized into three tracks:
- Fundamental, which is geared toward the Email Deployment Manager/Coordinator;
- Intermediate, which is intended for Interactive/Direct Marketing Managers and Directors; and
- Advanced, which is for Executive Marketing/Advertising Leads and CMOs.

We've all been to conferences where we sat in sessions that were either totally over our heads or didn't tell us anything new at all. The three-track format is designed to ensure that all attendees are getting information tailored to their expertise levels. As you can see from the agenda, the sessions cover a wide range of email marketing topics, from acquisition and list management to multichannel marketing and our charity work with the Women's Bean Project. It should be very educational and a lot of fun.

We'll be releasing more details about sessions, events and speakers in the weeks ahead. We have lots of cool things planned, so stay tuned.

From the 'Arsenal of Oops'

Wednesday, October 31, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

In last week's newsletter, Jeanniey confessed that she's no deployment expert: "I am notorious for sending emails with typos, links that don't work, image hosting paths that only work on my PC, messing up segments and more." She shared her favorite oopsy and said that the mistakes that she's made have all taught her phenomenal lessons. And then she asked if anyone had a "disastrous email story" to share—and many brave souls stepped forward to share their lesson-learned.

My two-cents on this is that mistakes in emails are difficult to avoid because of the complexity of the medium and volume involved. All you can do is try your best and learn from your mistakes—and the mistakes of others. That's why I started the Oopsy Hall of Fame (I'll be inducting the 2007 class in January). It allows marketers to see what kinds of mistakes are prevalent and try to avoid repeating them. It also touches on apologies—when they need to be made and when they don't. I also just recently did a post on apology emails after I heard David Baker say that apology emails have higher open rates than even welcome emails.

Anyway, without further delay, here are the oopsies that our subscribers shared with us.

—Chad White

* * *

You are definitely not the only one! I have an arsenal of 'oops' but I'll share my favorite of all time. I was adding the physical mailing address and associated contact details to the bottom of an email for a B2B campaign. The phone number I needed to add was spelled out and as I was translating the letters to numbers by looking at my phone and using my keyboard (forgetting that the layout of the numbers are different) – I inadvertently transposed two numbers. The correct number would have pointed someone to a help desk for product support; the incorrect number pointed to a phone sex line. There were only a few reports of people actually calling that number. I believe one was a CEO.

Naturally, I learned from this and physically dial all of the phone numbers on anything I ever send out! (And I learned that phone sex lines are not limited to 900 numbers!)

—Amy Gabriel, BT

* * *

We develop our clients' newsletters on a development server and then switch them to the live server before deployment. We have individual user names and passwords for the development server. We once sent out a "live" deployment to our client's entire list from our development server, which means that everyone who received it would have been prompted for a user name and password before they could read the email! Oops!

—Jenni Fox, Miles Media Group

* * *

You are not the only one who sends email disasters! I work with volunteers and was sending an email to a large group to arrange a conference call, including several I had never worked with before. I listed the possible dates/times, including "am" and "pm" options. My email was set up to spell check before sending. I wasn't paying attention, and instead of clicking 'ignore all' on the am & pm options, clicked 'change all.' They were all changed to "Pam"—unfortunately, that's also my name! We've had a good laugh about "Pam time."

I frequently request bids from vendors via email. I usually copy and paste the details, and just change the greeting. One day a message to "Mike" began with "Hi Brian"—his main competitor!
Needless to say, I'm not responsible for hitting "send" on the real campaigns!

—Pamela Asfahani, Oncology Nursing Certification Corp.

* * *

I sent out a weekly article alert on a Monday not knowing that the URL structure for the articles linked from the email was going to change on Tuesday. The old URLs were not redirecting to the new URLs, so none of the links in the email worked. I now double check every link before the weekly alert goes out and make sure that there won't be any changes affecting those links taking place.

—Kari Rippetoe, GoWholesale

* * *

Well, I'm not sure it was a *disaster*, but it wasn't good. Within a regular monthly update we do on our virtual learning classes, we were also announcing our first digital download product created from one of our most popular teleclasses.

I had just started inserting links a bit differently than in the past. I had gotten out of the habit of checking every link because they had always worked, but when I added tracking codes to the 4 links in the email that had to do specifically with the new product, it broke them all - every single one.

For whatever reason, I thought to check them just *after* I hit the send button (of course). Another 20 minutes later and I had the links fixed and a new email sent out. I think everyone got the fixed-link email before they had a chance to find the broken links in the first. And, this email went to our most loyal customers, graduates of our programs, who tend to be very forgiving. But still. . .not my favorite moment! :-)
—Sara Avery, Newfield Network Inc.

* * *

Your post about email goofs is timely. I wrote an email promotion yesterday [Oct. 24] in which I used my own experience being evacuated due to SD fires to promote a teleseminar about legal issues and how we can't be too prepared or cautious. Two people responded they thought it was a bit insensitive. Maybe the fires are too hot to talk about yet in a marketing context. So I blogged an apology.

—Patsi Krakoff, The Blog Squad

* * *

Love it! Struck a note in my world….. I'm also supposed to be an expert and every time I try to do tactical things, I screw up too…..

—David Baker, Avenue A | Razorfish

* * *

My worst flubs are pretty much the garden variety; once forgot to change the old link to a sale page (very woops), and a few typos…

I'm writing because I thought it was very ironic that the very first link after your article (the one to update my profile) didn't work! I was very entertained, nearly fell off my chair in fact.

Thanks for brightening my day :)
—Rachelle Johnson, iSpectrum Marketing

[Rachelle was one of three people to catch that intentional error. We like to keep you on your toes. :) ]

Deliverability Wisdom from ClickZ Specifics Conference

Thursday, October 4, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

Based on what I saw at the ClickZ Specifics: Email Marketing conference yesterday, deliverability remains the hot topic. They had a packed session dedicated to the topic and it also came up during the closing 5 Experts/5 Minutes session, where five experts were given 60 seconds each to answer a question from the audience. Here is some of the wisdom that I jotted down:

Regarding first steps…
Stefan Pollard of EmailLabs said to start by knowing your metrics—your delivery rate, bounce management, spam complaints, etc. You can make improvements if you don't know where your program stands currently.

Deidre Baird of Pivotal Veracity said that you should get on ISPs' whitelists (which is free) and take advantage of spam compliant feedback loops.

Regarding list rental/buying…
Baird also said to avoid spamtraps by not buying lists and harvesting addresses from the web. Only use opt ins, she said.

Jordan Ayan of SubscriberMail said flatly, "Don't ever buy a list."

Rebecca Lieb of ClickZ said that they were very close to advising readers to never rent or buy lists, but that they hadn't quite reached that point yet.

Regarding offline sign-ups with incentives…
If you're offering incentives in order to collect email addresses offline, be sure to "deliver the incentive to the email address," said Austin Bliss of FreshAddress. The customer is more likely to give you their real address and to write legibly if the incentive is being delivered this way.

Lieb told a story of a major apparel retailer that gave in-store customers a 20% off coupon in exchange for their email address. Well, people wrote down bogus addresses in order to get the discount and those addresses lead to the retailer being blacklisted. Ouch!

Pollard recommended using double opt-in for offline sources of acquisition.

Regarding B2B filtering…
"B2B filtering is more whimsical than B2C," said Bliss.

Baird said that companies rely much more on spam lists like Spamhaus and SpamCop.

Regarding authentication…
People were universally proponents of authentication (DKIM and Sender ID), which makes it clear that you are who you say you are, thereby fighting spoofing. But they also all said that it currently doesn't lead to better deliverability, as very few ISPs give authentication serious weigh yet when deciding which emails to filter. However, some of the experts thought this would be given more weight in the future.

Regarding cleaning up old, dirty lists…
Pollard told marketers to look at the date of subscription—the older the date, the more likely you should just cut them. He also advised people to remove role addresses like sales@domain.com.

Al DiGuido of Zustek said you should cut people who haven't opened an email in the past 6-12 months.

But Ayan said not to assume that your emails are going unread because the subscriber could have images turned off. He said it's best if you send a series of emails asking if they want to continue receiving email.

—Chad White

Direct to You from Connections 07 in Indianapolis

Tuesday, October 2, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

The ExactTarget User Conference unveils the dawning of a new technological day, and re-inspires the market with email.

I attended Day 1 of the ExactTarget user conference (Connections 07) today and … Wow… is the best way to describe the event. With over 650 people in attendance (some were turned away), including over 75 agencies, the conference was a big hit.

Eec member Chip House, from ExactTarget, can do a much better job than me of giving you the details of the event, but I will say this: The commentary on ExactTarget's new partnerships, technological features and approach to email was inspiring.

I was personally involved in a panel on deliverability, which Chip moderated, and he deserves a big bottle of gin for dealing with all of us. After a fantastic opening, the panel was turned over to Craig Spiezle from Microsoft, David Daniels from JupiterResearch and me. We discussed the key issues everyone needed to know regarding the technical side of deliverability and reputation, the marketers' view of relevance, list hygiene and reputation, and the agency/consumer side of how to take all the knowledge and do something productive with it (like increase funding for email in your organization, or integrate delivery into the planning process). The content was top notch and even included, at no additional cost, a very nice improv from the three of us. Let's see, there were jokes about how Craig just never stops talking :-P, how David Daniels not only loves his Bloody Mary Deliverability cocktails, but how he is also God and controls the lights, just to emphasize his points. This was probably the most fun I have had on a panel in awhile—and the content was good too.

I've asked a few of the conference attendees to write me on Facebook and let me know how the next two days go. And I'd like to shout out to the ET team and ask them to share as much as they can from the conference with the eec community. It's great stuff!

—Jeanniey Mullen

MEMBER SPOTLIGHT: Lauren Skena, E-Marketing Manager of the National Geographic Society

Thursday, August 9, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

Participation in the eec's Roundtables makes you smarter, better connected, and more in-the-know, beautiful and recognized in the industry. But who's got time for that when we can barely get through the week? Who are these people who seem to be able to find time in their own hectic schedules to move the industry forward? This week in the Spotlight is one of them—Lauren Skena, co-chair of the Research & Intelligence Roundtable.

If you are like most people, you can't bear to recycle or throw away those National Geographic magazines—there is something faintly unpatriotic and painful about parting with the iconic yellow-bordered covers. Of course, keeping the magazine in a corner of the cupboard is not the same as reading it and acting on the articles. Behind that citron-hued brand is an active Society that wants to involve you in nature, community and world preservation.

Lauren Skena, E-Marketing Manager of the National Geographic SocietyGiven the ability of email marketing to connect and engage with subscribers, it's no surprise that email has become a primary method of communication for the National Geographic Society. Lauren Skena, manager of e-marketing, runs the email program from the D.C. office and despite the strong brand and reluctance of many readers to part with their stacks of printed magazines, she faces the same issues we all do when it comes to creating email relevance, governing frequency, going multichannel, optimizing deliverability and battling for mindshare in the inbox.

Lauren says she acts as a gatekeeper between subscribers and the 25+ divisions of the Society that use email as a form of communication. "It's like an in-house agency," she says, "where the multichannel direct marketing is handled for all the National Geographic departments from TV, film, online, catalog and the magazine and website editorial groups to special projects like our current Genographic project."

National Geographic logoThere is a lot for email to do. While the mission of the Society is to increase and diffuse geographic knowledge while promoting the conservation of the world's cultural, historical and natural resources, the Society also wants to sell subscriptions, films, educational guides, maps and travel adventures.

"I often have to be the one to say, 'No, you can't have that date for an email campaign,'" she says in regards to keeping a central email marketing schedule for the society. "All of the divisions and the philosophy of the Society center on protection and respect of our members and subscribers so most of the groups understand the need for frequency caps, respecting permission grants from other divisions to essentially 'borrow' their names and limits on the types of messages that drive ISP complaints.

"It's all one brand, but email in particular creates opportunity for the divisions to work together. We do a lot of cross promotion in newsletters," Lauren says. "We don't allow use of another division's permission group, but, for example, we encourage the Travel group to include Adventure Magazine messages, etc. Email and the database are a strategic asset for upselling and creating memorable customer experiences overall."

Leading one of the DMA's Email Experience Council's roundtables was a natural fit for Lauren, as the DMA brought her to the National Geographic Society in the first place! Prior to her current job, Lauren worked for the DMA, marketing events to members. At a DMA conference, she met the Society team and agreed to join just as email marketing began to be a focus area in the direct marketing group.

"I've always been a fan of National Geographic and, personally speaking, The DMA was supportive of my joining such a good member and great organization," she says of the transition. "It's natural for me to want to come back and participate, as I know firsthand the good work the DMA does in the community."

"The Society supports my involvement 100%—I always hear support and ideas," she says. "My director and vice president always encourage involvement within the community, including active participation in applicable groups, speaking opportunities and networking events."

Lauren chose the Research & Intelligence Roundtable because she knows how much research can be helpful to members, and frankly, saw some holes in the current benchmarking and available research that she hoped to fill. She wants to know what consumers are thinking and feeling about email—and to turn that information into actionable insight that email marketers can use today.

"I'd also like to publish benchmarks using the membership as an industry panel. I see a quarterly report that addresses problems that email marketers are trying to solve and identifies what is missing in the available data stream," she says. "Ultimately, I'd like this Roundtable to help make the DMA research and Annual Report more relevant to the email marketing community."

The R&I Roundtable has some major goals that are achievable and aspirational, but Lauren and her co-chair, Todd Purcell of American Express, want to create opportunities for members to do both small as well as larger involvements. Lauren plans to split the Roundtable into small working committees of two or three people, so that the work is manageable.

"There is so much that we could do, and it can get overwhelming," she says. "It was hard to put the mission together! But separating out the projects will help us achieve more and allow each member to have a rewarding experience."

"There is room and opportunity for all types of members," she says. "For example, my co-chair, Todd, brings a wealth of business experience as a user of research, and our companies are so vastly different it allows our two perspectives to balance and expand on each other."

Lauren also takes full advantage of the eec affiliation, speaking on a panel at the DMA's Email Summit this past May and serving on the Advisory Committee for the February event. The newly merged eec is in a powerful position, she says. "It's good to have everyone together, and to have one larger group that is working on one set of initiatives, rather than two groups working on similar initiatives. Frankly, the DMA has to be more involved in the online space and this is a great way to push that forward."

Lauren's advice to all of us is to get involved. "Get involved and see what is available," she says. "The networking possibilities alone make it worth being active in a Roundtable. You'll meet people who may be able to help you along the way. Plus, you get referrals, vendor reviews, all the whitepapers and research."

"Show this to your boss and offer to be involved," she says. "You just can't get this sort of career and program value with a passive membership."

Identity Crisis at Inbox?

Thursday, May 31, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

I'm here at the Inbox Conference in San Jose where I'll be moderating three panels. The keynote just kicked off and I'm hoping that people are just having trouble getting up because the Keynote is going on and there are only about 60 people in a room that looks like it can hold 350. Maybe it's a case of a bridge too far: one conference in the email space too many (although I'm hoping not since not only do I hope someone comes to my sessions but my company is exhibiting as well).

But I think it points to the importance of defining your conference. The Email Insider conference is positioned as the high end networking event for email marketers. The Marketing Sherpa show seems to setting up themselves as the Email 101 and Case Study conference. There is the ClickZ one-day email refreshers. And then the slew of ad:tech and DMA shows.

Inbox started out as the email show for the tech crowd. But last year it started integrating marketing tracks as well. Now they seem to be incorporating word of mouth and other forms of marketing. It is hard to know who this show is aimed at.

I think there is a market for a tech-only show, though. Sometimes you just have to pick you audience and go for it. I'll hopefully post later about how things are progressing. It looks like I may have some time.

—Bill McCloskey

Deliverability Shouldn’t Be King

Friday, May 18, 2007 by eec Blog Contributor

"Content is no longer king," Craig Spiezle, director of online safety strategies and technologies at Microsoft, told Email Insider Summit attendees last week. "If you don't have email authentication, your emails are going to be throttled."

Spiezle then told the audience about a large flower retailer that used a new domain to send out its Mother's Day campaign this year, sending millions of emails from a domain with no reputation. "Did we deliver those emails [to our Hotmail users]?" he said. "No we did not." And now they have a warehouse of wilting flowers, said Spiezle in a matter-of-fact tone that said, It serves them right for what they did.

Deliverability was a big topic at the Summit, which is unfortunate. Content is the rightful king. Content is strategic, while deliverability is simply tactical. A focus on deliverability is a distraction and takes us farther away from C-suite conversations we want to have about email by turning email into an IT discussion.

Spiezle, who presented email authentication as the golden path to deliverability, said that 43% of legitimate email volume is certified by Sender ID, and he later told me that adoption is north of 85% among volumne email marketers and that 9 million domains have been authenticated. And among the major online retailers that I track via RetailEmail.Blogspot, Sender ID adoptin is at 59% while DomainKeys adoption is at 48% (read reportlet on DomainKeys adoption among retailers). So authentication is rapidly approaching the point where if you don't have it then you'll be in the minority.

While authentication adoption is growing, some audience members were angry, saying that Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and AOL make permission-based marketers jump through too many hoops, have different standards and don't allow marketers to transfer their reputation from one IP address or domain to another. Spiezle said that they were working on this last point, saying that "reputation should be portable."

However, Spiezle and Miles Libbey, office of postmaster at Yahoo Mail, who also spoke at the conference, really had no satisfactory answer for their varying standards. Spiezle said that Microsoft will protect its customers and Yahoo will protect its customers. There's clearly an opportunity for collaboration to create a single standard that would make it easier for legitimate marketers to send their email and customers to receive it.

At the end of the conference, Bill McCloskey, CEO of Email Data Source, astutely remarked that while everyone claims to be protecting the customer, that's not what's really happening. That certainly wasn't the case in Spiezle's flower retailer example, said McCloskey, who said that his first thought after hearing the story was that there were a lot of mothers that didn't get flowers this year.

That's what's wrong with the current state of deliverability—it doesn't always serve the customer's best interests. Even though these customers opted in and wanted to receive these emails, they were blocked. If the ISPs truly care about their customers, then they'll work with legitimate marketers to simplify the rules so that their mutual customers can be better served. Then we can get back to talking about content, customer-centricity, user-friendliness and other more strategic issues that can take email to a higher plane.

—Chad White